A few days back, I posted a picture of me as my Twitter avatar. There’s nothing so weird about that except for the fact that I don’t recall ever using a picture of myself for Twitter. I’ve always used an image of some faceless entity. So an image of the real me (all be it a weird image of me) caused a minor sensation amongst my Twitter followers (as minor and minor sensations can be).
I got into a conversation with a couple of them about facelessness and my affinity for it. She asked if that could be a blog post because, quite frankly, I can’t explain it in 140 characters or less. So here goes.
The truth is, you encounter facelessness every day. Do you have a favourite radio station you listen to on the way to work? Maybe it’s one of those morning shows or something where the DJs are supposed to be funny but so rarely are. At the very least, you might have a station you just listen to regardless of the time of day. It may even be NPR, who knows? So that station has a staff of on air personalities, from the weirdo morning DJ to the chipper and cheery female DJ who is on in the afternoons.
What do they look like?
Seriously, would know them if you bumped into them on the street?
Been to a movie recently? You ever notice how there only seems to be three or four guys who provide voice over work for trailers? If you’ve been to the movies at all recently, say the last 20 years, you’ve heard them. If you go to the cinema often, you’ve heard them a lot.
What do they look like?
I watch a lot of documentaries, especially historical and science documentaries. I’m a big fan of Mythbusters and How It’s Made. Both of those shows have a narrator to explain what’s going on when something is just happening without any explanation from anyone else. This is especially true on Mythbusters where the narrator is just as much part of the show as Adam and Jamie. He chimes in when the two guys are doing awesome stuff, but they’re not explaining it because they are, after all, busy.
Have any idea what he looks like?
You probably don’t. They’re real people, but utterly faceless. They’re not devoid of identity at all, but they lack the one quality we, as humans so readily equate with identity and that quality is a face.
For some reason, this kind of thing fascinates me. The Question, from DC Comics, is my favourite superhero for a lot of reasons. However, the biggest reasons I dig on him is his secret identity. DC and other comic characters have a long history of stupid secret identities. Superman puts on glasses and no one recognizes him. Oliver Queen puts on a small, barely there, green mask and suddenly everyone thinks that Ollie is gone and the Green Arrow is here. Diana Prince lets her hair down, takes off her glasses (what is it with glasses), and takes off some of her clothes and suddenly she’s Wonder Woman!
We all recognize that as bogus because they didn’t change their appearance at all. For a mild mannered reporter, Clark Kent happens to be built like a fucking train yard. No one ever seems to question the fact that Ollie Queen and the Green Arrow look exactly alike. Diana Prince is a beautiful, Amazon type woman who’s tall, has black hair, and wears these weird bracelets. And very few people in DC ever put two and two together to get Wonder Woman out of this.
Meanwhile The Question doesn’t wear a weird costume. Hell, the man is wearing a suit. He doesn’t have any strange headgear like Batman. Indeed that’s just a regular fedora on his head. And he doesn’t wear a colourful mask like Green Arrow or take off his glasses like Superman and Wonder Woman. Instead, he takes off his face. His disguise is the ultimate disguise. You can’t recognize him not because he’s wearing a costume, not because he’s sporting a cape and cowl. No, you can’t recognize because he doesn’t have a face. In the real world, and thankfully in comics too, if there’s no face, we’re pretty much clueless about who a person is.
In art, the concept of facelessness is there to remove not only identity, but also personality. It can be dehumanizing, or it might not. It could possibly be liberation. Either way, we always see the absence of a face as something radical, something far removed from the norm.
When I created the Faceless Historian character, I used ideas I’d developed from watching late night History Channel documentaries. Most of them revolved around World War II as subject matter and almost none of them had a visible narrator. He was just someone in the background, voicing over stock footage of dogfights, Hitler speeches, and scenes of infantrymen assaulting, well, something. I thought about the work that went into one of these things, especially since I was kicking around the idea of doing a documentary series myself. A lot of people work on a documentary, and the one person you might see when it’s all done is whoever is going to speak during the production.
Nope, that person remains faceless. Although the Faceless Historian doesn’t, it’s hard for some people to believe that I’m the only guy working that show. I think it’s obvious, but some people have been very surprised to find out that I have no research support, no camera man. no editor, no sound man, no editor, and no director. I do the whole thing from the research and writing to setting up the cameras to shooting it to editing and postproduction. Hell, that opening and closing song? I wrote it and recorded it using my electronic keyboard and Adobe Audition.
Perhaps the historian may not be so faceless this time around, but the writer, musician, editor, producer, webmaster and sound guy are.